↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Counseling: Next Generation Counseling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Genomic Counseling: Next Generation Counseling
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10897-013-9641-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Mills, Susanne B. Haga

Abstract

Personalized medicine continues to expand with the development and increasing use of genome-based testing. While these advances present new opportunities for diagnosis and risk assessment, they also present challenges to clinical delivery. Genetic counselors will play an important role in ushering in this new era of testing; however, it will warrant a shift from traditional genetic counseling to "genomic counseling." This shift will be marked by a move from reactive genetic testing for diagnosis of primarily single-gene diseases to proactive genome-based testing for multiple complex diseases for the purpose of disease prevention. It will also require discussion of risk information for a number of diseases, some of which may have low relative risks or weak associations, and thus, may not substantially impact clinical care. Additionally, genomic counselors will expand their roles, particularly in the area of health promotion to reduce disease risk. This additional role will require a style of counseling that is more directive than traditional counseling and require greater knowledge about risk reducing behaviors and disease screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Other 8 8%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,311,926
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#390
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,011
of 198,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.