↓ Skip to main content

Access to Care Outcomes: A Telephone Interview Study of a Suburban Safety Net Program for the Uninsured

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,212)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Access to Care Outcomes: A Telephone Interview Study of a Suburban Safety Net Program for the Uninsured
Published in
Journal of Community Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10900-013-9746-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joe Feinglass, Narissa J. Nonzee, Kara R. Murphy, Richard Endress, Melissa A. Simon

Abstract

Access DuPage (AD) currently provides primary care for about 14,000 low income, uninsured residents of suburban DuPage County, IL, an area with a very limited healthcare safety net infrastructure. A telephone interview survey evaluated health care utilization, satisfaction, and health status outcomes and compared recent enrollees to individuals in the program for at least 1 year. Sequential new AD enrollees (n = 158) were asked about the previous year when uninsured, while randomly selected established AD enrollees (n = 135) were asked the same questions about the previous year when actively enrolled in AD. Established enrollees reported being more likely to get 'any kind of tests or treatment' (96.3 vs. 46.2 %, p < 0.0001), fewer cost (78.5 vs. 21.3 %, p < 0.0001) and transportation barriers to care, more preventive and mental health services, and better self-management care. However, established enrollees also reported 14 % greater use of hospital inpatient and 9 % greater use of emergency room care, as well as continued difficulty in accessing needed specialty and dental care services. Despite more (diagnosed) conditions, established enrollees were over 2.5 times more likely to report good to excellent health status and over three times more likely to rate their satisfaction with health care as good to excellent. Findings illustrate the substantial benefits of assuring access to care for the uninsured, but do not reflect immediate savings from reduced hospital utilization. Access to care programs will be an important tool to address the needs of the 30 million people who will continue to be uninsured in the United States.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Barbados 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Social Sciences 10 14%
Psychology 7 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#830,215
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#50
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,843
of 198,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.