Title |
Positive Interactions Between Irrawaddy Dolphins and Artisanal Fishers in the Chilika Lagoon of Eastern India are Driven by Ecology, Socioeconomics, and Culture
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ambio, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13280-013-0440-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Coralie D’Lima, Helene Marsh, Mark Hamann, Anindya Sinha, Rohan Arthur |
Abstract |
In human-dominated landscapes, interactions and perceptions towards wildlife are influenced by multidimensional drivers. Understanding these drivers could prove useful for wildlife conservation. We surveyed the attitudes and perceptions of fishers towards threatened Irrawaddy dolphins (Orcaella brevirostris) at Chilika Lagoon India. To validate the drivers of fisher perceptions, we : (1) observed dolphin foraging behavior at stake nets, and (2) compared catch per unit effort (CPUE) and catch income of fishers from stake nets in the presence and absence of foraging dolphins. We found that fishers were mostly positive towards dolphins, believing that dolphins augmented their fish catch and using culture to express their perceptions. Foraging dolphins were observed spending half their time at stake nets and were associated with significantly higher catch income and CPUE of mullet (Liza sp.), a locally preferred food fish species. Wildlife conservation efforts should use the multidimensional drivers of human-wildlife interactions to involve local stakeholders in management. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 23% |
India | 1 | 8% |
Thailand | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 3 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 137 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 19% |
Unknown | 24 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 32% |
Environmental Science | 34 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 11% |
Unknown | 29 | 20% |