↓ Skip to main content

Variability of diagnostic criteria and treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome across European countries

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Variability of diagnostic criteria and treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome across European countries
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00431-017-2891-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georges Deschênes, Marina Vivarelli, Licia Peruzzi, On behalf of the ESPN Working Group on Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Abstract

The aim of the surveys conducted by the Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome Working Group of the ESPN was to study the possible variability of treatment in Europe at different stages of the disease by means of questionnaires sent to members of the Working Group. Four surveys have been completed: treatment of the first flare, treatment of the first relapse and the issue of steroid dependency, use of rituximab, and the management of steroid-resistant patients. A uniform treatment of the first flare was applied in only three countries, and ten additional centers have adopted one of the three main protocols. Reported treatment of the first relapse was relatively uniform, whereas the use of additional immunosuppressants in steroid dependency was widely variable. Rituximab had already been used in hundreds of patients, although the formal evidence of efficiency in steroid dependency was relatively recent at the time of the survey. The definition of steroid resistance was variable in the European centers, but strikingly, the first-line treatment was uniform throughout the centers and included the combination of prednisone plus calcineurin antagonists. The variability in the approach of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is unexpectedly large and affects treatment of the first flare, strategies in the case of steroid dependency, as well as the definitions of steroid resistance. What is Known: • Steroids and immunosuppressants are the universal treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. What is New: • The variability of treatments and strategy of treatment in European centers of pediatric nephrology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 52%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#12,837,509
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2,187
of 3,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,406
of 308,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#26
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.