Title |
Managing an invasive predator pre-adapted to a pulsed resource: a model of stoat (Mustela erminea) irruptions in New Zealand beech forests
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Invasions, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10530-011-9993-y |
Authors |
Carolyn M. King, Roger A. Powell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 120 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 22% |
Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 59% |
Environmental Science | 27 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,157,490
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#631
of 2,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,585
of 108,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.