| Title |
An Agenda for Advancing the Science of Implementation of Evidence-Based HIV Prevention Interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AIDS and Behavior, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10461-009-9556-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wynne E. Norton, K. Rivet Amico, Deborah H. Cornman, William A. Fisher, Jeffrey D. Fisher |
| Abstract |
In the past 25 years, a tremendous amount of time and resources have been committed to developing evidence-based HIV prevention interventions. More recently, there have been noteworthy efforts to develop an infrastructure and related policies to promote the dissemination (i.e., "the targeted distribution of information and intervention materials to a specific public health or clinical practice audience") of evidence-based interventions. Despite these advances, however, we have had comparatively little success in the effective implementation (i.e., "the use of strategies to adopt and integrate evidence-based health interventions and change practice patterns within specific settings") of such interventions in everyday practice or community settings. The objective of the current paper is to highlight select and initial areas of research that are critically needed to advance the state-of-the-science of implementation of HIV prevention interventions in our broader efforts to curb the epidemic worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 23% |
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 18% |
| Psychology | 8 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2014.
All research outputs
#13,974,601
of 24,479,790 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,751
of 3,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,406
of 97,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,479,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.