↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of mental health legislation from diverse Commonwealth jurisdictions

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of mental health legislation from diverse Commonwealth jurisdictions
Published in
International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, March 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.02.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

E.C. Fistein, A.J. Holland, I.C.H. Clare, M.J. Gunn

Abstract

In the regulation of involuntary treatment, a balance must be found between duties of care and protection and the right to self-determination. Despite its shared common roots, the mental health legislation of Commonwealth countries approaches this balance in different ways. When reform is planned, lessons can be learned from the experiences of other countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Psychology 13 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,901,433
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Law & Psychiatry
#601
of 973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,425
of 108,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Law & Psychiatry
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.