↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the mammalian sensory space: co-operations and trade-offs among senses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the mammalian sensory space: co-operations and trade-offs among senses
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00359-013-0846-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sirpa Nummela, Henry Pihlström, Kai Puolamäki, Mikael Fortelius, Simo Hemilä, Tom Reuter

Abstract

The evolution of a particular sensory organ is often discussed with no consideration of the roles played by other senses. Here, we treat mammalian vision, olfaction and hearing as an interconnected whole, a three-dimensional sensory space, evolving in response to ecological challenges. Until now, there has been no quantitative method for estimating how much a particular animal invests in its different senses. We propose an anatomical measure based on sensory organ sizes. Dimensions of functional importance are defined and measured, and normalized in relation to animal mass. For 119 taxonomically and ecologically diverse species, we can define the position of the species in a three-dimensional sensory space. Thus, we can ask questions related to possible trade-off vs. co-operation among senses. More generally, our method allows morphologists to identify sensory organ combinations that are characteristic of particular ecological niches. After normalization for animal size, we note that arboreal mammals tend to have larger eyes and smaller noses than terrestrial mammals. On the other hand, we observe a strong correlation between eyes and ears, indicating that co-operation between vision and hearing is a general mammalian feature. For some groups of mammals we note a correlation, and possible co-operation between olfaction and whiskers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 26%
Researcher 24 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 47%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 9%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,532,208
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#929
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,598
of 203,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.