↓ Skip to main content

Existence of feline morbillivirus infection in Japanese cat populations

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Existence of feline morbillivirus infection in Japanese cat populations
Published in
Archives of Virology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00705-013-1813-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsuya Furuya, Yukiko Sassa, Tsutomu Omatsu, Makoto Nagai, Ryuji Fukushima, Makoto Shibutani, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Yosuke Uematsu, Kinji Shirota, Tetsuya Mizutani

Abstract

Feline morbillivirus (FmoPV) is a member of a new virus species that has only been found in the Hong Kong cat population. For the first time, however, we have now detected nucleotide sequences similar to FmoPV in samples from Japanese cat populations. The positive rates for urine and blood samples from Japanese cats were 6.1 % (5/82) and 10 % (1/10), respectively. These sequences are similar to the previously reported FmoPV, with 92-94 % identity, and substantially different from all other morbilliviruses. Phylogenetic analysis of the identified Japanese FmoPVs and other morbilliviruses demonstrated a pattern similar to those previously published for the FmoPV viruses isolated in Hong Kong. FmoPV RNA was also detected from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) kidney tissues of cats with nephritis, with a positive rate of 40 % (4/10). By using nested-set primers based on the FmoPV sequence and RNA from FFPE tissues, we demonstrated the existence of FmoPV infection in Japanese cats and established the method for detection of the FmoPV RNA from kidney tissues prepared for pathology examinations, which is useful for studies on the pathogenicity of the virus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 13 28%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2014.
All research outputs
#12,822,871
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#2,221
of 4,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,066
of 197,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.