↓ Skip to main content

Novel CACNA1A mutation(s) associated with slow saccade velocities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Novel CACNA1A mutation(s) associated with slow saccade velocities
Published in
Journal of Neurology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00415-013-7099-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Kipfer, Simon Jung, Johannes R. Lemke, Anna Kipfer-Kauer, Jeremy P. Howell, Alain Kaelin-Lang, Thomas Nyffeler, Klemens Gutbrod, Angela Abicht, René M. Müri

Abstract

Mutations in the voltage-gated Cav2.1 P/Q-type calcium channel (CACNA1A) can cause a wide spectrum of phenotypes, including the episodic ataxia type 2. Beside the growing number of descriptions of novel CACNA1A mutations with episodic ataxia type 2 phenotype; there are only rare reports on interictal oculomotor signs other than nystagmus. We describe a novel CACNA1A mutation and an unclassified CACNA1A in-frame variant in a Swiss family presenting as the episodic ataxia type 2 phenotype associated with reduced saccade velocity. In this case series interictal clinical examination showed only minimal neurological findings as mild limb ataxia and nystagmus, but most interestingly saccade analysis of all three affected individuals demonstrated reduced mean saccade velocity. Genetic testing of CACNA1A revealed a de novo frame-shift mutation (c.2691dupC/p.Thyr898Leufs 170) in the index patient in addition to an unclassified in-frame variant (c.6657_6659dupCCA/p.His2220dup) segregating in all three affected individuals. The de novo frame-shift CACNA1A mutation and the unclassified in-frame CACNA1A variant were associated with the episodic ataxia type 2 phenotype and reduced mean saccade velocity, which suggests involvement of brainstem or neural pathways connecting brainstem and the cerebellum in this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 41%
Neuroscience 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,202,510
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,963
of 4,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,759
of 201,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#27
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.