↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of Conductive Hearing Loss Using Wideband Acoustic Immittance

Overview of attention for article published in Ear and hearing (Print), July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prediction of Conductive Hearing Loss Using Wideband Acoustic Immittance
Published in
Ear and hearing (Print), July 2013
DOI 10.1097/aud.0b013e31829c9670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth A. Prieve, M. Patrick Feeney, Stefan Stenfelt, Navid Shahnaz

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to review the effectiveness of wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) and tympanometry in detecting conductive hearing loss (CHL). Eight studies were included that measured CHL through air-and bone-conducted thresholds in at least a portion of their participants. One study included infants, three studies included children, one study included older children and adults, and three studies included adults. WAI identified CHL well in all populations. In infants and children, WAI in several single-frequency bands identified CHL with equal accuracy to measures of middle ear admittance using clinical tympanometry with a single probe tone (1000 Hz for infants; 226 Hz for children and adults). When WAI was combined across frequency bands, it identified CHL superior to traditional, single-frequency tympanometry. Only two studies used WAI tympanometry, which assesses the outer/middle ear across both frequency and introduced air pressure, and differing results were reported as to whether introducing pressure into the ear canal provides better identification of CHL. In general, WAI appears to be a promising clinical tool, and further investigation is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#414
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,995
of 206,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.