↓ Skip to main content

An assessment of potential of hybrid poplar for planting in the Virginia Piedmont

Overview of attention for article published in New Forests, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
An assessment of potential of hybrid poplar for planting in the Virginia Piedmont
Published in
New Forests, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11056-017-9576-6
Authors

Harold E. Burkhart, Amy M. Brunner, Brian J. Stanton, Richard A. Shuren, Ralph L. Amateis, Jerre L. Creighton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 57%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New Forests
#259
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,702
of 325,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Forests
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.