You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Management of over-the-counter insomnia complaints in Australian community pharmacies: a standardized patient study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/ijpp.12052 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Krishneeta C Kashyap, Lisa M Nissen, Simon S Smith, Greg Kyle |
Abstract |
To evaluate the current management of over-the-counter (OTC) insomnia complaints in Australian community pharmacies using standardized patient methodology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 34 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 35 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
#543
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,480
of 196,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.