| Title |
Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.12181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 732 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 702 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 176 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 121 | 17% |
| Researcher | 104 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 100 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 78 | 11% |
| Unknown | 126 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 423 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 52 | 7% |
| Psychology | 26 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 42 | 6% |
| Unknown | 165 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#398,159
of 32,726,043 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#125
of 3,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,608
of 237,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,726,043 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.