| Title |
Social Impairments in Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11.2DS): Autism Spectrum Disorder or a Different Endophenotype?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-013-1920-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen Angkustsiri, Beth Goodlin-Jones, Lesley Deprey, Khyati Brahmbhatt, Susan Harris, Tony J. Simon |
| Abstract |
High prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has been reported in 22q11.2DS, although this has been based solely on parent report measures. This study describes the presence of ASD using a procedure more similar to that used in clinical practice by incorporating history (Social Communication Questionnaire) AND a standardized observation measure (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule) and suggests that ASD is not as common as previously reported in 22q11.2DS. Differences in methodology, along with comorbid conditions such as anxiety, likely contribute to false elevations in ASD prevalence and information from multiple sources should be included in the evaluation of ASD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 23% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 21% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#295,776
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#80
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,172
of 214,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.