↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of tumors during tissue-conserving surgery with integrated autofluorescence and Raman scattering microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
6 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis of tumors during tissue-conserving surgery with integrated autofluorescence and Raman scattering microscopy
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1311289110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenny Kong, Christopher J. Rowlands, Sandeep Varma, William Perkins, Iain H. Leach, Alexey A. Koloydenko, Hywel C. Williams, Ioan Notingher

Abstract

Tissue-conserving surgery is used increasingly in cancer treatment. However, one of the main challenges in this type of surgery is the detection of tumor margins. Histopathology based on tissue sectioning and staining has been the gold standard for cancer diagnosis for more than a century. However, its use during tissue-conserving surgery is limited by time-consuming tissue preparation steps (1-2 h) and the diagnostic variability inherent in subjective image interpretation. Here, we demonstrate an integrated optical technique based on tissue autofluorescence imaging (high sensitivity and high speed but low specificity) and Raman scattering (high sensitivity and high specificity but low speed) that can overcome these limitations. Automated segmentation of autofluorescence images was used to select and prioritize the sampling points for Raman spectroscopy, which then was used to establish the diagnosis based on a spectral classification model (100% sensitivity, 92% specificity per spectrum). This automated sampling strategy allowed objective diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma in skin tissue samples excised during Mohs micrographic surgery faster than frozen section histopathology, and one or two orders of magnitude faster than previous techniques based on infrared or Raman microscopy. We also show that this technique can diagnose the presence or absence of tumors in unsectioned tissue layers, thus eliminating the need for tissue sectioning. This study demonstrates the potential of this technique to provide a rapid and objective intraoperative method to spare healthy tissue and reduce unnecessary surgery by determining whether tumor cells have been removed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 198 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 28%
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Master 22 11%
Other 8 4%
Student > Bachelor 7 3%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 33 16%
Physics and Astronomy 25 12%
Chemistry 25 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 47 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#445,581
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,985
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,392
of 202,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#90
of 876 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 876 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.