↓ Skip to main content

If the cap fits, wear it: an overview of telomeric structures over evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
If the cap fits, wear it: an overview of telomeric structures over evolution
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00018-013-1469-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick Fulcher, Elisa Derboven, Sona Valuchova, Karel Riha

Abstract

Genome organization into linear chromosomes likely represents an important evolutionary innovation that has permitted the development of the sexual life cycle; this process has consequently advanced nuclear expansion and increased complexity of eukaryotic genomes. Chromosome linearity, however, poses a major challenge to the internal cellular machinery. The need to efficiently recognize and repair DNA double-strand breaks that occur as a consequence of DNA damage presents a constant threat to native chromosome ends known as telomeres. In this review, we present a comparative survey of various solutions to the end protection problem, maintaining an emphasis on DNA structure. This begins with telomeric structures derived from a subset of prokaryotes, mitochondria, and viruses, and will progress into the typical telomere structure exhibited by higher organisms containing TTAGG-like tandem sequences. We next examine non-canonical telomeres from Drosophila melanogaster, which comprise arrays of retrotransposons. Finally, we discuss telomeric structures in evolution and possible switches between canonical and non-canonical solutions to chromosome end protection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
India 2 3%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 64 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 25%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,754,776
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,431
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,585
of 203,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.