| Title |
What Causes Unexplained Pain in Patients With Metal‐on metal Hip Devices? A Retrieval, Histologic, and Imaging Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3199-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danyal H. Nawabi, Nader A. Nassif, Huong T., Kirsten Stoner, Marcella Elpers, Edwin P. Su, Timothy Wright, Hollis G. Potter, Douglas E. Padgett |
| Abstract |
Adverse tissue reactions associated with metal-on-metal (MOM) hips are common in resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty (THA) designs. The etiology of these reactions in painful, well-positioned arthroplasties is inconsistently described. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 43% |
| Engineering | 12 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#19,916,939
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,956
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,510
of 210,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#66
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.