| Title |
Incorporating Patient-reported Outcomes in Total Joint Arthroplasty Registries: Challenges and Opportunities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3193-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia D. Franklin, Leslie Harrold, David C. Ayers |
| Abstract |
Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) registries traditionally have focused on implant longevity and rates of revision surgery. Registries would benefit from the addition of standardized patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as pain relief and improved physical function. However, PROs have not been routinely adopted, and their incorporation into TJA registries presents challenges. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 23% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,638,639
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#770
of 7,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,222
of 210,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#14
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.