↓ Skip to main content

Bone Microarchitecture of the Talus Changes With Aging

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Bone Microarchitecture of the Talus Changes With Aging
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3195-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Krause, Martin Rupprecht, Marcus Mumme, Klaus Püschel, Michael Amling, Florian Barvencik

Abstract

Fractures of the talus in the elderly are rare and usually result from high-impact injuries, suggesting only minor age-related bone structure changes. However, total ankle replacement failures with age often result from talar subsidence, suggesting age-related bone loss in the talus. Despite a number of histological analyses of talar microarchitecture, the effects of age and sex on talar microarchitecture changes remain poorly defined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sri Lanka 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Engineering 8 15%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,335
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,753
of 210,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#78
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.