↓ Skip to main content

2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hypertension, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
781 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
891 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Published in
Journal of Hypertension, October 2013
DOI 10.1097/hjh.0b013e328364ca4c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Mancia, Robert Fagard, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Josep Redán, Alberto Zanchetti, Michael Böhm, Thierry Christiaens, Renata Cifkova, Guy De Backer, Anna Dominiczak, Maurizio Galderisi, Diederick E. Grobbee, Tiny Jaarsma, Paulus Kirchof, Sverre E. Kjeldsen, Stéphane Laurent, Athanasios J. Manolis, Peter M. Nilsson, Luis Miguel Ruilope, Roland E. Schmieder, Per Anton Sirnes, Peter Sleight, Margus Viigimaa, Bernard Waeber, Faiez Zannad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 891 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 <1%
Argentina 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 870 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 108 12%
Student > Master 103 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 88 10%
Researcher 85 10%
Other 213 24%
Unknown 203 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 394 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 3%
Other 99 11%
Unknown 237 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,700,145
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hypertension
#578
of 5,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,994
of 223,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hypertension
#9
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.