↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Diabetic Complications

Overview of attention for article published in Physiological Reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1978 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2664 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of Diabetic Complications
Published in
Physiological Reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1152/physrev.00045.2011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine M. Forbes, Mark E. Cooper

Abstract

It is increasingly apparent that not only is a cure for the current worldwide diabetes epidemic required, but also for its major complications, affecting both small and large blood vessels. These complications occur in the majority of individuals with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Among the most prevalent microvascular complications are kidney disease, blindness, and amputations, with current therapies only slowing disease progression. Impaired kidney function, exhibited as a reduced glomerular filtration rate, is also a major risk factor for macrovascular complications, such as heart attacks and strokes. There have been a large number of new therapies tested in clinical trials for diabetic complications, with, in general, rather disappointing results. Indeed, it remains to be fully defined as to which pathways in diabetic complications are essentially protective rather than pathological, in terms of their effects on the underlying disease process. Furthermore, seemingly independent pathways are also showing significant interactions with each other to exacerbate pathology. Interestingly, some of these pathways may not only play key roles in complications but also in the development of diabetes per se. This review aims to comprehensively discuss the well validated, as well as putative mechanisms involved in the development of diabetic complications. In addition, new fields of research, which warrant further investigation as potential therapeutic targets of the future, will be highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,664 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 2635 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 386 14%
Student > Master 350 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 275 10%
Researcher 197 7%
Student > Postgraduate 150 6%
Other 440 17%
Unknown 866 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 629 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 271 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 239 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 161 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 133 5%
Other 312 12%
Unknown 919 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,305,727
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Physiological Reviews
#170
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,923
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological Reviews
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.