You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Habitat partitioning and vulnerability of sharks in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-013-9324-8 |
| Authors |
Daniela M. Ceccarelli, Ashley J. Frisch, Nicholas A. J. Graham, Anthony M. Ayling, Maria Beger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,838,548
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#322
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,120
of 204,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.