↓ Skip to main content

Experimental measles encephalitis in Lewis rats: dissemination of infected neuronal cell subtypes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Experimental measles encephalitis in Lewis rats: dissemination of infected neuronal cell subtypes
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13365-013-0199-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrike Jehmlich, Jennifer Ritzer, Jens Grosche, Wolfgang Härtig, Uwe G. Liebert

Abstract

Acute measles may lead in rare instances to the chronic progressive central nervous system disease process subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE). SSPE results from a persistent measles virus (MV) infection with incomplete virus replication involving the entire human brain. The experimental encephalitis model in Lewis rats was used to define affected cell populations after infection with the neurotropic MV strain CAM/RB. Distribution patterns of MV were analysed by appropriate cell markers in the brain sections of infected animals employing multiple immunofluorescence labelling and confocal laser scanning microscopy. MV was detected in neurones but not in astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells. GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons displayed MV antigen whereas cholinergic and catecholaminergic neurons appeared devoid of MV immunoreactivity. Mapping of the rat brain has revealed MV-infected neurones predominantly in motor, somatosensory, auditory, and visual cortices as well as in the basal ganglia and thalamic nuclei of infected rats. The results indicate that MV apparently disseminates via GABAergic and glutaminergic neurones and their processes. The tightly restricted viral distribution pattern is consistent with both inefficient immune clearance from infected neurones and with the observed disease symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 17%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#653
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,662
of 200,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.