| Title |
Improving practice in community-based settings: a randomized trial of supervision – study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shannon Dorsey, Michael D Pullmann, Esther Deblinger, Lucy Berliner, Suzanne E Kerns, Kelly Thompson, Jürgen Unützer, John R Weisz, Ann F Garland |
| Abstract |
Evidence-based treatments for child mental health problems are not consistently available in public mental health settings. Expanding availability requires workforce training. However, research has demonstrated that training alone is not sufficient for changing provider behavior, suggesting that ongoing intervention-specific supervision or consultation is required. Supervision is notably under-investigated, particularly as provided in public mental health. The degree to which supervision in this setting includes 'gold standard' supervision elements from efficacy trials (e.g., session review, model fidelity, outcome monitoring, skill-building) is unknown. The current federally-funded investigation leverages the Washington State Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Initiative to describe usual supervision practices and test the impact of systematic implementation of gold standard supervision strategies on treatment fidelity and clinical outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 10% |
| Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 37 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 69 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,212,568
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,079
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,100
of 197,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.