↓ Skip to main content

(Deviant) Friends With Benefits

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(Deviant) Friends With Benefits
Published in
Social Psychological and Personality Science, August 2013
DOI 10.1177/1948550613499939
Authors

Michael Thai, Fiona Kate Barlow, Matthew J. Hornsey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 43%
Researcher 3 14%
Lecturer 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 71%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,279,577
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychological and Personality Science
#1,252
of 1,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,914
of 197,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychological and Personality Science
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.