| Title |
Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan E Branda, Annie LeBlanc, Nilay D Shah, Kristina Tiedje, Kari Ruud, Holly Van Houten, Laurie Pencille, Marge Kurland, Barbara Yawn, Victor M Montori |
| Abstract |
Patient-centered diabetes care requires shared decision making (SDM). Decision aids promote SDM, but their efficacy in nonacademic and rural primary care clinics is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 229 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 50 | 22% |
| Unknown | 53 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 74 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,695,328
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,786
of 7,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,670
of 197,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#62
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.