| Title |
Complications of Cemented Long‐stem Hip Arthroplasty in Metastatic Bone Disease Revisited
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3113-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shawn L. Price, Aabid M. Farukhi, Kevin B. Jones, Stephen K. Aoki, Lor R. Randall |
| Abstract |
The literature suggests that a cemented long-stem femoral arthroplasty is associated with increased intraoperative and perioperative risks. Embolic events may precipitate cardiopulmonary complications and even death; by contrast, others have reported that the use of a cemented long-stem femoral arthroplasty in patients with metastatic bone disease is a safe procedure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 83% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,622,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#767
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,309
of 209,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#11
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.