↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00268-017-3955-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Schlottmann, Fernando A. Herbella, Marco E. Allaix, Fabrizio Rebecchi, Marco G. Patti

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects an estimated 20% of the population in the USA, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. Lifestyle modifications and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy are effective in the majority of patients and remain the mainstay of treatment of GERD. However, some patients will need surgical intervention because they have partial control of symptoms, do not want to be on long-term medical treatment, or suffer complications related to PPI therapy. The aim of this study was to review the available evidence that supports laparoscopic antireflux surgery, and to study the effect of surgical therapy on the natural history of GERD. The key elements for the success of antireflux surgery are proper patient selection, careful analysis of the indications for surgery, complete pre-operative work-up, and proper execution of the surgical technique. When the key elements are respected, antireflux surgery is very effective in controlling GERD, and it is associated to minimal morbidity and mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 32 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 36 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,499,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,589
of 4,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,865
of 327,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#36
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.