↓ Skip to main content

Managing Unexpected Events in the Manufacturing of Biologic Medicines

Overview of attention for article published in BioDrugs, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Managing Unexpected Events in the Manufacturing of Biologic Medicines
Published in
BioDrugs, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40259-013-0018-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Grampp, Sundar Ramanan

Abstract

The manufacturing of biologic medicines (biologics) requires robust process and facility design, rigorous regulatory compliance, and a well-trained workforce. Because of the complex attributes of biologics and their sensitivity to production and handling conditions, manufacturing of these medicines also requires a high-reliability manufacturing organization. As required by regulators, such an organization must monitor the state-of-control for the manufacturing process. A high-reliability organization also invests in an experienced and fully engaged technical support staff and fosters a management culture that rewards in-depth analysis of unexpected results, robust risk assessments, and timely and effective implementation of mitigation measures. Such a combination of infrastructure, technology, human capital, management, and a science-based operations culture does not occur without a strong organizational and financial commitment. These attributes of a high-reliability biologics manufacturer are difficult to achieve and may be differentiating factors as the supply of biologics diversifies in future years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,148,654
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from BioDrugs
#167
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,026
of 202,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioDrugs
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.