| Title |
Comparison of Total Knee Arthroplasty With Highly Congruent Anterior-stabilized Bearings versus a Cruciate-retaining Design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3068-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher L. Peters, Patrick Mulkey, Jill Erickson, Michael B. Anderson, Christopher E. Pelt |
| Abstract |
The use of a highly conforming, anterior-stabilized bearing has been associated with clinical success in a limited number of studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 25% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 56% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,970,494
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,356
of 7,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,721
of 209,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#79
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.