| Title |
In Vivo Kinematics of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint During Three Isometric Functional Tasks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3063-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eni Halilaj, Michael J. Rainbow, Christopher Got, Joel B. Schwartz, Douglas C. Moore, Arnold-Peter C. Weiss, Amy L. Ladd, Joseph J. Crisco |
| Abstract |
The thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is often affected by osteoarthritis--a mechanically mediated disease. Pathomechanics of the CMC joint, however, are not thoroughly understood due to a paucity of in vivo data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 27 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,982,793
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,072
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,559
of 208,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#48
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.