| Title |
The Relationship Between Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Impairment in Children With and Without ADHD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10802-013-9767-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuko Watabe, Julie Sarno Owens, Steven W. Evans, Nicole Evangelista Brandt |
| Abstract |
This study examined impairment in multiple domains of functioning in children with and without ADHD who present with high or low levels of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) while taking into account the total symptom ratings of ADHD. Participants were 584 children in kindergarten through eighth grade (55.7 % male, 91.7 % Caucasian), drawn from five archival datasets. Two, 2 (SCT groups: high and low) x 3 (ADHD Status: ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and non-ADHD) MANCOVAs were conducted with the total ADHD symptom ratings and child age as covariates. One MANCOVA was conducted on scores on the teacher Impairment Rating Scale (IRS; Fabiano et al. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 35:369-385, 2006) and the other on the 6 scores on the parent IRS. The results indicated that the presence of SCT symptoms was associated with greater functional impairment at home according to parent report while it was associated with less functional impairment at school according to teacher report. Thus, the relationship between SCT symptoms and impairment differs depending on the informant and the context in which impairment is evaluated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 43% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,364
of 2,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,853
of 210,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.