↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Utility of an Intimate Partner Violence Screening Tool for Female VHA Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Utility of an Intimate Partner Violence Screening Tool for Female VHA Patients
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11606-013-2534-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine M. Iverson, Matthew W. King, Patricia A. Resick, Megan R. Gerber, Rachel Kimerling, Dawne Vogt

Abstract

Female Veterans are at high risk for physical, sexual, and psychological forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization. This study evaluated the accuracy of a brief IPV victimization screening tool for use with female Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 25%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 33 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2013.
All research outputs
#992,913
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#848
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,362
of 197,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#12
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.