You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Circulating Fragments of N-Terminal Pro–B-Type Natriuretic Peptides in Plasma of Heart Failure Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Chemistry, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1373/clinchem.2012.200204 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jared Yong Yang Foo, Yunxia Wan, Benjamin L. Schulz, Karam Kostner, John Atherton, Justin Cooper-White, Goce Dimeski, Chamindie Punyadeera |
Abstract |
The use of nonstandardized N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) assays can contribute to the misdiagnosis of heart failure (HF). Moreover, there is yet to be established a common consensus regarding the circulating forms of NT-proBNP being used in current assays. We aimed to characterize and quantify the various forms of NT-proBNP in the circulation of HF patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Chemistry | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,898,586
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#468
of 7,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,647
of 220,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.