↓ Skip to main content

Methodological Issues for Studying Asexuality

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Methodological Issues for Studying Asexuality
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10508-009-9502-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew C. Hinderliter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 86 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Student > Master 20 22%
Student > Bachelor 19 21%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 46%
Social Sciences 17 19%
Arts and Humanities 13 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,177,097
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,771
of 3,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,445
of 92,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.