↓ Skip to main content

Weber Osteotomy for Large Hill-Sachs Defects: Clinical and CT Assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Weber Osteotomy for Large Hill-Sachs Defects: Clinical and CT Assessments
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3024-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra L. Brooks-Hill, Bruce B. Forster, Case van Wyngaarden, Robert Hawkins, William D. Regan

Abstract

The Weber derotation osteotomy is an uncommon procedure that typically is reserved for patients with engaging Hill-Sachs defects who have had other surgical treatments for shoulder instability fail. It is unknown whether the desired humeral derotation actually is achieved with the Weber osteotomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 24 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,622,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#767
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,142
of 205,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#9
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.