↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Impact of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Impact of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-5796-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoya Sudo, Ryosuke Nishida, Akihiko Kawahara, Kouhei Saisho, Koshi Mimori, Akira Yamada, Atsuhi Mizoguchi, Kazutaka Kadoya, Satoru Matono, Naoki Mori, Toshiaki Tanaka, Yoshito Akagi

Abstract

Recently, several immune checkpoint inhibitors have been developed and are being used to treat malignant melanoma, lung cancer, and other cancers. Several reports have indicated that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with clinical and histopathologic risk factors in various cancers. However, the role of TILs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been well studied. This study aimed to investigate the perilesional status of TILs in ESCC and to show associations between TILs and clinical variables. The study enrolled 277 ESCC patients. Evaluation of TILs was performed according to the criteria of the International TILs Working Group 2014, and associations between TIL and clinicopathologic variables were examined. Most of the clinicopathologic factors were not statistically associated with TIL status. The number of patients who received adjuvant therapy was significantly larger in the TIL-negative group. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients in the TIL-positive group was significantly better than in the TIL-negative group. Among the patients who received adjuvant therapy, CSS was significantly better in the TIL-positive group than in the TIL-negative group. Uni- and multivariate analyses identified tumor depth and TIL status as independent prognostic factors for CSS. Among the other clinicopathologic variables, TIL status was the strongest CSS indicator. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte status is a strong predictor of good prognosis for ESCC patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,153,585
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,015
of 6,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,363
of 420,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#22
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.