| Title |
Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-012-1470-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicki Tsianakas, Glenn Robert, Jill Maben, Alison Richardson, Catherine Dale, Theresa Wiseman |
| Abstract |
The aim of this paper was to briefly describe how the experience-based co-design (EBCD) approach was used to identify and implement improvements in the experiences of breast and lung cancer patients before (1) comparing the issues identified as shaping patient experiences in the different tumour groups and (2) exploring participants' reflections on the value and key characteristics of this approach to improving patient experiences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 255 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Researcher | 37 | 14% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 16% |
| Design | 27 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,872,095
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,114
of 5,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,086
of 175,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.