↓ Skip to main content

The formation of flashbulb memories

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, May 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
267 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The formation of flashbulb memories
Published in
Memory & Cognition, May 1994
DOI 10.3758/bf03200860
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin A. Conway, Stephen J Anderson, Steen F Larsen, C. M. Donnelly, M. A. McDaniel, A. G. R. McClelland, R. E. Rawles, R. H. Logie

Abstract

A large group of subjects took part in a multinational test-retest study to investigate the formation of flashbulb (FB) memories for learning the news of the resignation of the British prime minister, Margaret Thatcher. Over 86% of the U.K. subjects were found to have FB memories nearly 1 year after the resignation; their memory reports were characterized by spontaneous, accurate, and full recall of event details, including minutiae. In contrast, less than 29% of the non-U.K. subjects had FB memories 1 year later; memory reports in this group were characterized by forgetting, reconstructive errors, and confabulatory responses. A causal analysis of secondary variables showed that the formation of FB memories was primarily associated with the level of importance attached to the event and level of affective response to the news. These findings lend some support to the study by R. Brown and Kulik (1977), who suggest that FB memories may constitute a class of autobiographical memories distinguished by some form of preferential encoding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 137 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 52%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,684,834
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#114
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#409
of 22,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them