You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The footprint of Alaskan tundra fires during the past half-century: implications for surface properties and radiative forcing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044039 |
| Authors |
Adrian V Rocha, Michael M Loranty, Phil E Higuera, Michelle C Mack, Feng Sheng Hu, Benjamin M Jones, Amy L Breen, Edward B Rastetter, Scott J Goetz, Gus R Shaver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 21% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,169,874
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1,486
of 6,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,484
of 294,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#15
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.