| Title |
Molecular analyses of the sediment of the 11000-m deep Mariana Trench
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Extremophiles, August 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s007920050024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chiaki Kato, Lina Li, Jin Tamaoka, Koki Horikoshi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,261,278
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#64
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,974
of 29,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them