| Title |
Early recognition of coeliac disease through community pharmacies: a proof of concept study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-017-0432-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heidi Urwin, David Wright, Michael Twigg, Norma McGough |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
| Engineering | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,210,168
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#204
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,631
of 422,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.