↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
471 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 2006
DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm3103_2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willemieke Kroeze, Andrea Werkman, Johannes Brug

Abstract

Although computer-tailored promotion of dietary change and physical activity has been identified as a promising intervention strategy, there is a need for a more systematic evaluation of the evidence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Netherlands 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 297 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 23%
Student > Master 60 18%
Researcher 51 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 7%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 36 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 15%
Social Sciences 49 15%
Computer Science 31 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Other 63 19%
Unknown 57 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,645,291
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#372
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,383
of 64,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them