Title |
The global signature of the ENSO and SST-like fields
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00704-012-0773-0 |
Authors |
Costas A. Varotsos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 7% |
Portugal | 1 | 7% |
Argentina | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Lecturer | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 47% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2012.
All research outputs
#2,201,610
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#101
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,905
of 174,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.