| Title |
Palm Uses in Northwestern South America: A Quantitative Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Botanical Review, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12229-011-9086-8 |
| Authors |
Manuel J. Macía, Pedro J. Armesilla, Rodrigo Cámara-Leret, Narel Paniagua-Zambrana, Soraya Villalba, Henrik Balslev, Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 22% |
| Unknown | 44 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,843,098
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#18
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,812
of 117,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them