You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Current Interventions for the Left Main Bifurcation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanveer Rab, Imad Sheiban, Yves Louvard, Fadi J. Sawaya, Jun Jie Zhang, Shao Liang Chen |
| Abstract |
Contemporary clinical trials, registries, and meta-analyses, supported by recent results from the EXCEL (Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) and NOBLE (Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis) trials, have established percutaneous coronary intervention of left main coronary stenosis as a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with low and intermediate SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores. As left main percutaneous coronary intervention gains acceptance, it is imperative to increase awareness for patient selection, risk scoring, intracoronary imaging, vessel preparation, and choice of stenting techniques that will optimize procedural and patient outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 40% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 63% |
| Scientists | 13 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 55% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,141,119
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#451
of 4,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,217
of 325,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#7
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.