| Title |
Animating the Carbon Cycle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-013-9715-7 |
| Authors |
Oswald J. Schmitz, Peter A. Raymond, James A. Estes, Werner A. Kurz, Gordon W. Holtgrieve, Mark E. Ritchie, Daniel E. Schindler, Amanda C. Spivak, Rod W. Wilson, Mark A. Bradford, Villy Christensen, Linda Deegan, Victor Smetacek, Michael J. Vanni, Christopher C. Wilmers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 435 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 109 | 24% |
| Researcher | 80 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 153 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 140 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 31 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Unknown | 96 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#289,005
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#5
of 1,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,104
of 214,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.