↓ Skip to main content

Computer literacy and E-learning perception in Cameroon: the case of Yaounde Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
Title
Computer literacy and E-learning perception in Cameroon: the case of Yaounde Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Published in
BMC Medical Education, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georges Bediang, Beat Stoll, Antoine Geissbuhler, Axel M Klohn, Astrid Stuckelberger, Samuel Nko’o, Philippe Chastonay

Abstract

Health science education faces numerous challenges: assimilation of knowledge, management of increasing numbers of learners or changes in educational models and methodologies. With the emergence of e-learning, the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) and Internet to improve teaching and learning in health science training institutions has become a crucial issue for low and middle income countries, including sub-Saharan Africa. In this perspective, the Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (FMBS) of Yaoundé has played a pioneering role in Cameroon in making significant efforts to improve students' and lecturers' access to computers and to Internet on its campus.The objective is to investigate how computer literacy and the perception towards e-learning and its potential could contribute to the learning and teaching process within the FMBS academic community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 322 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Researcher 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 78 24%
Unknown 89 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 23%
Social Sciences 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 9%
Computer Science 27 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 104 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,177,097
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,950
of 3,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,707
of 197,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#25
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.