↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine, uncertainty and TD learning

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dopamine, uncertainty and TD learning
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, May 2005
DOI 10.1186/1744-9081-1-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yael Niv, Michael O Duff, Peter Dayan

Abstract

Substantial evidence suggests that the phasic activities of dopaminergic neurons in the primate midbrain represent a temporal difference (TD) error in predictions of future reward, with increases above and decreases below baseline consequent on positive and negative prediction errors, respectively. However, dopamine cells have very low baseline activity, which implies that the representation of these two sorts of error is asymmetric. We explore the implications of this seemingly innocuous asymmetry for the interpretation of dopaminergic firing patterns in experiments with probabilistic rewards which bring about persistent prediction errors. In particular, we show that when averaging the non-stationary prediction errors across trials, a ramping in the activity of the dopamine neurons should be apparent, whose magnitude is dependent on the learning rate. This exact phenomenon was observed in a recent experiment, though being interpreted there in antipodal terms as a within-trial encoding of uncertainty.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 3%
France 7 2%
United States 6 2%
Switzerland 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 272 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 25%
Student > Master 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 57 18%
Unknown 25 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 19%
Neuroscience 56 18%
Computer Science 30 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 38 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,202,510
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#332
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,231
of 57,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.